There’s an intriguing argument being made about the COVID pandemic response, and it’s coming from a rather unexpected source—a woman. She suggests, in about one minute, that the entire reaction to the virus was driven by a distinctly female worldview. Honestly, this is the spiciest and best take we’ve ever seen, and it’s a perspective worth exploring, especially when we consider how the response played out: an emotional, hysterical overreaction, completely lacking any rational long-term thinking, fueled by fear, manipulation, and a “mean girl” mentality that pressured everyone to fall in line or else.
Think about it. Instead of a measured, data-driven approach, we saw a wave of panic wash over the entire globe, pushing us into lockdowns, school closures, and economic chaos—all based on worst-case scenarios and the inability to see beyond the immediate threat. Sadly, this is the very essence of the female reaction: focusing on the here and now without pausing to consider the bigger ramifications. It’s like the entire world was thrown into the arms of a frantic, overly protective helicopter mother who was desperate to shield her children from danger and ended up causing more harm than good.
The truth is, we had the data from Italy pretty early on—showing that the average age of death from COVID was around 80, with most victims having three or more comorbidities. This proved that what we were dealing with was unfortunate, but it was hardly the apocalypse we were led to believe it was. But, instead of assessing the situation with calm and reason, the response was sheer hysteria. We shut down entire economies, isolated people from their loved ones, and wreaked havoc on children’s social, mental, and physical development—all for what? A fear-driven, knee-jerk reaction that had “hysterical woman” written all over it.
“The covid response was the embodiment of the female worldview” pic.twitter.com/9elhNNRXfF
— Jack Poso 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) September 24, 2024
[…]
— Read More: revolver.news