The WEF does not confine itself to transforming agricultural production by allowing corporate profiteers to feast at the trough of innovations, technologies, data-driven tracking, AI, and other chemical-churning initiatives to counter the carbon dioxide culprit: it has an urgent plan to transform what people eat. Unsurprisingly, the WEF focuses on climate, equity, and gender as part of its “Global Health Equity Network.”
Health equity requires communities, government, civil society, and the private sector to come together to drive systems change. Together they can target the root causes of disparity and the non-medical drivers of health to achieve health equity.
Only fascism can solve disparities, we are here told – a blending of all private and government entities with “civil society” (secular humanism?) to “drive systems change,” a/k/a the “Great Reset.” Aside from whether this is an open conspiracy, the cacophony of cockamamie climate claims against cows and in favor of GMO crops, pesticides, satellite and product tracking, and other techno-wizardy should be evidence enough that profits – not people, or the “root causes” of disparities – are the actual focus of this agenda.
Which crypto-backed IRA is best?
– BlockTrust IRA is ideal for managed accounts.
– iTrustCapital is for buy and hold.
“Studies” and “experts” cannot make a cow jump over the moon. Nor can they make GMO crops that are healtheir for soil and humanity than cows. And yet the barrage of anti-cow propaganda continues to sway climate-frightened ears. These organizations also continuously shift objectives to justify their sales pitches. Is food control necessary to save humanity from climate change, famine, wars, overpopulation, social injustices, or biodiversity loss? The answer is “whatever deceives the ears” – industrial agriculture has aggravated or caused all these problems!
Yet “studies” are constantly churned out to sing corporate lullabies to gullible humans. Consider this rationalization of how to usher in world peace from a “paper” titled “Can genetically modified (GM) crops act as possible alternatives to mitigate world political conflicts for food?”
According to our analyses, GM crops can improve food security and in broader way can alter political conflicts; thus, the food supply chain and policy decisions about safe GM crops should be the areas worth reconsidering. It can also be concluded that developing countries, especially those from Africa, but also India are particularly affected and being susceptible to drought or civil conflict by food insecurity that can lead to famine or near-famine conditions. According to our analyses, if the GM crop is not considered as factor to mitigate conflict, no positive effects on food insecurity can be expected.
This pseudo-scientific baloney concludes that people must abandon safety concerns regarding GMO crops to avert war – especially in those third-world nations over whom Henry Kissinger and the new globalists are so fond of crying crocodile tears. The sweet-sounding message is “give us total control and we will provide total security” – using the toxin-laden foods and rampant techno-manufacturing that are killing the ecosystem and sickening the human populations of developed nations. Niccolo Machiavelli’s warning for these times is harsh but apposite: “Men are so stupid and concerned with their present needs, they will always let themselves be deceived.” […]
— Read More: granitegrok.com
