First reported in December, a series of eight interim reports provided by a whistleblower reveals the Department of Defense’s participation in a longitudinal SARS-CoV-2 (coronavirus) seroprevalence study of 29,000 military service members between May 2020 and June 2021. To avoid being released outside of DOD, each document is marked “For Official Use Only” or “Controlled Unclassified Information.”

As noted in the Gateway Pundit report, “A seroprevalence study can be a helpful indicator of the development of herd immunity, which occurs when a large portion of a population becomes immune to a disease through infection or vaccination, making it difficult to spread.”

Thanks to the whistleblower, the public is now aware that the military likely achieved herd immunity as early as June 2021, months prior to Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin’s now-rescinded 2021 COVID-19 shot mandate. Tens of thousands of service members were negatively affected, and treating the data on military herd immunity seriously could have resulted in a decision not to impose the vaccine mandate, which unnecessarily exposed thousands to a problematic vaccine they didn’t need, while forcing many more out of the military for refusing “the jab.”

WorldNetDaily interviewed Nick Kupper, a retired Air Force veteran who experienced the COVID-19 era while in service and is now a member-elect of the Arizona House of Representatives, set to assume office on Tuesday, Jan. 13.

Long before the military’s rollout of the COVID-19 shot mandate, Kupper was familiar with tests to detect the presence of antibodies in the blood. He had already used such testing to acquire medical exemptions for a handful of vaccines required by the Air Force. “Although I was never against vaccines, I had the right amount of antibodies for some of them, so I didn’t feel the need to put something in my body if I didn’t need it,” he told WND.

Kupper suspects he may have had COVID-19 in July 2020, but admitted he was not interested in being tested for the virus at this time. Coincidentally, in the months to follow, he donated blood at a facility that also tested for COVID-19 antibodies. He had none.

However, following a short period of illness with a typical COVID symptoms like body aches in January 2021, COVID antibodies were indeed present in his blood the next time he donated in February. Donating blood in May, his blood tested positive for antibodies once again. Seeking another antibody test in July to quantify the presence of neutralizing antibodies in his blood, he discovered that he had “a ton.” A third blood test confirmed the same.

With Defense Secretary Austin’s shot mandate coming into play in August 2021, Kupper went to an immunologist to begin the process of seeking an exemption. Previously, he said, medical exemptions had only required evidence of immunity based on serologic tests or documented infection. But for the so-called COVID-19 vaccination, he was shocked to discover that he would not be provided with an exemption.

“My bosses won’t let me [grant an exemption],” Kupper was told by the immunologist. Added Kupper, “He was the one person on the entire base who’s qualified to make that decision, but he wasn’t allowed to do so.”

With that, in September 2021, he filed for a religious accommodation request. Like thousands of other service members, the request was denied and he was set to be separated. Coincidentally, on the same day he was ordered to separate from the Air Force, Kupper was given a letter of reprimand for sharing his story with Tucker Carlson . Less than a week later, due to a legal injunction for Air Force members, he was able to retire after nearly 19 years of honorable service.

In a worst-case scenario, according to the agency’s own Interim Report #8, DOD should have been made aware that both the seroprevalence rate and presence of neutralizing antibodies in service members was on a clear path to herd immunity sometime between June 2021 and November 2021. Yet the findings of the DOD’s study weren’t shared publicly until August 2023.

Kupper was not surprised, he said, considering it “par for the course of everything DOD was doing at the time.” More than that, he said, “It pisses me off.” Admittedly, he is most frustrated about “how the government, military and supposed leaders can disobey the law and refuse to right the wrongs they’ve done.”

To retrieve more information related to the Department of Defense’s SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence Study, this reporter submitted a Freedom of Information Act request on Dec. 18. A case number has been assigned, but an estimated completion date has not been provided.

Content created by the WND News Center is available for re-publication without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected].

Now, in the early stages of Bird Flu Pandemic Panic Theater 2.0, she’s taking to the airwaves to sell a ludicrous idea to the American people. She wants the Biden regime to start administering Bird Flu “vaccines” to the public before President Donald J. Trump takes office.

You can try to make this up but you won’t be successful…

Reactions on X have been brutal…

Hell no. https://t.co/axDbn5ThC5

— Derrick Van Orden (@derrickvanorden) December 29, 2024

Leana Wen also said the “unvaccinated” should not be able to leave their homes. She can take a seat. https://t.co/RkrsDU9Zrv

— Jason (@HambrechtJason) December 29, 2024

Wen can F off! https://t.co/IMckEocaLm

— Genevieve (@GenevieveBayer) December 29, 2024

Born in China, Obama buddy, former president of planned parenthood & was demanding mandates on vax. https://t.co/JZ6dDv6Xha

— Johnny St.Pete (@JohnMcCloy) December 29, 2024

she is one of the most unhinged lunatic karen in spreading covid fearmongering hoax in all time

— Andrew Fisher (@acpandy) December 29, 2024

Dr. Leana Wen pushed vaccine passports, downplayed natural immunity, flip-flopped on lockdowns & masks. She now wants bird flu vaccines in the next 25 days! Her track record of MISINFORMATION shows why we shouldn’t take her seriously. https://t.co/Z19nQpaSTS

— Amy Reichert (@amyforsandiego) December 29, 2024

Nope. Not doing this again. https://t.co/D0mVzKcG3s

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) December 29, 2024

No. https://t.co/LMFo29xD8e

— Jason Nelson (@RealJasonNelson) December 29, 2024

No, we will not comply pic.twitter.com/FxNpoAHJa4

— Hawky McHawkyface (@jwjg83805) December 29, 2024

NOPE. NOT AGAIN.

This damn lady was a vocal architect of some of the worst policies the has ever tried to implement.

She’s the LAST person that should be given a platform to advocate for what the medical industry & the people of this country should do.

Piss off @DrLeanaWen https://t.co/wC99ZRExsu

— 𝑍ᴀᴄᴋ Ꮹɪᴀɴɪɴᴏ (@ZackGianino) December 29, 2024

While it seems many if not most Americans are done with Plandemics, we cannot underestimate the willingness of millions of sheep to be led to the slaughter. Many simply do not learn their lesson. Let’s pray there are fewer who comply this time than with the first Pandemic Panic Theater.

(Natural News)—The recent recommendation by the European Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) to approve Kostaive, a self-replicating mRNA (saRNA) vaccine, marks a troubling escalation in the pharmaceutical industry’s push to deploy untested and potentially hazardous technologies on the global population. This decision, which now rests with the European Commission, raises serious concerns about the erosion of health freedom, government transparency, and the prioritization of corporate profits over public safety.

Self-replicating mRNA vaccines, such as Kostaive, are not merely another iteration of traditional mRNA technology. They represent a radical departure from conventional vaccines, introducing a mechanism that allows the injected mRNA to replicate within the body, akin to a viral infection. This “biological printing press” could theoretically amplify the vaccine’s presence and effects indefinitely, creating a cascade of unintended consequences that remain entirely unknown.

The clinical trial data for Kostaive is alarming, to say the least. Across phases 1, 2, and 3a, 90% of participants experienced adverse events after the first dose, with 74.5% reporting systemic reactions and 15.2% requiring medical attention. Five deaths were reported in the phase 3b study alone. These figures are not just statistics; they are human lives and health outcomes being sacrificed on the altar of expediency. Yet, despite these red flags, the CHMP has recommended approval, raising questions about the integrity of the regulatory process and the influence of pharmaceutical companies like Arcturus Therapeutics.

What is even more concerning is the lack of long-term safety data for these vaccines. As epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher aptly noted, “These products are completely new. There is absolutely no long-term safety data on them.” The potential for these self-amplifying mRNA vaccines to transform cells, induce cancerous mutations, or trigger autoimmune responses remains unstudied. The absence of comprehensive, independent research is a glaring omission in a decision that will affect millions of lives.

Japan’s approval of the same technology in 2023, with its own troubling adverse event rates, should serve as a cautionary tale. Yet, instead of learning from these experiences, the European Union appears poised to follow suit, prioritizing the interests of Big Pharma over the well-being of its citizens. This is not just a failure of regulatory oversight; it is a betrayal of public trust.

Self-replication destroys health freedom, bodily autonomy

The implications of self-replicating mRNA vaccines extend far beyond the immediate risks to individual health. These vaccines represent a dangerous precedent in the ongoing consolidation of power by pharmaceutical corporations and captured regulatory agencies. The lack of transparency, the suppression of dissenting voices, and the disregard for genuine safety concerns are all part of a broader pattern of control that threatens health freedom and democratic governance.

Moreover, the potential for these vaccines to be used as tools for population control cannot be ignored. The ability to inject self-replicating genetic material into the human body raises ethical questions that go to the heart of what it means to be free. Once these technologies are approved, the door is opened to further experimentation, with little regard for the long-term consequences.

The European Commission must reject this recommendation and halt the approval of Kostaive and similar self-replicating mRNA vaccines. The risks far outweigh the benefits, and the lack of long-term safety data renders this technology unfit for human use. Instead of rushing to embrace untested and dangerous innovations, regulators should prioritize the health and well-being of their citizens, conducting rigorous, independent studies and ensuring that any new vaccine meets the highest standards of safety and efficacy.

As natural health professionals, we stand firm in our conviction that health freedom is a fundamental human right. The approval of self-replicating mRNA vaccines would not only jeopardize this right but also set a dangerous precedent for future medical interventions. It is time for governments and regulatory agencies to listen to the voices of scientists, health professionals, and citizens who demand transparency, accountability, and genuine protection of public health. The future of health freedom depends on it.

Sources include:

• TheExpose.com
• Nature.com
• ChildrensHealthDefense.org
• NaturalNews.com

An unidentified shooter killed two people at the Abundant Life Christian School in Madison, Wis. before committing suicide. Dr. Kavita Patel told MSNBC host Chris Jansing that guns are a “public health crisis” before she attacked Kennedy’s nomination to lead the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Patel served in the Obama White House as the director of policy for the Office of Intergovernmental Affairs and Public Engagement.

“First responders know this better than anybody. They are not just the first to the scene, but I’ve been in the emergency room when we have had these shootings and we’re waiting for people, and we don’t get them,” Patel said. “Because… there are no people that can be saved, and then when you look at the aftermath of the violence, Chris, as we’ve seen, an escalation in the ability to print guns, the ease in which you can gain ammunition, the uneven pattern of laws, depending on the state you’re in and what the laws are, and, let’s just be honest, the culture of violence. I see it with my 10-year-old son, the video games his friends play. They normalize so much of this violence.”

“And I want to go back to American health policy. This is awful, but it’s a reminder that I need to keep at the screening that I do with patients on whether they have guns in the household, how they keep the guns safe, whether they have children in the household, what they do when other children visit their household,” Patel said. “I have had parents even say, ‘Should I ask other parents about guns in the household?’ I said you should. It should be a checklist, not even to think about it, but that’s part of what we’re talking about.”

President-elect Donald Trump announced Kennedy as his nominee for secretary of Health and Human Services in November. Kennedy in the past has questioned whether vaccines cause autism, a view popularized by a discredited study retracted by the Lancet in 2010.

“These are not just policies that we have to enact at our local level. They need to be implemented at the federal level,” Patel said. “And as we’re talking about a secretary of HHS potentially, we’re talking about people who are going to be in leadership position. They don’t even support science when we talk about vaccines. How are we going to depend on them to support the science around gun violence, as it’s literally unfolding in front of our eyes, and it’s tragic.”

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

From 1983 up to 1986, when the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, otherwise known as the Vaccine Act passed the U.S. Congress, there were only seven vaccines for children, including diphtheria, tetanus toxoids and pertussis (DPT), oral attenuated poliovirus (OPV), measles, mumps and rubella virus (MMR) and adult tetanus and diphtheria toxoids (TD). There were no vaccines recommended for adults and pregnant women.

However, the 1986 Vaccine Act gave Big Pharma mandatory and national liability protection for the medical community. It also limited the venue for a vaccine claim to Washington DC. Moreover, there were no more universal releases, mass communication or documentation provided to parents on what to watch out for following the vaccination schedule.

Vaccine activists have been lobbying against the Vaccine Act since the beginning, as it “tilted the balance of public good against individual rights and protection.” Critics point out that victims of vaccine injuries are left with the long-term side effects of the jabs, while the medical community and Big Pharma are protected from any accountability. Worse, they continue to create more and more experimental injections.

And now, over 200 vaccines are included in the schedule, including five routine injections during pregnancy, over 70 routine childhood injections (from birth to age 18) and over 130 routine adult injections (up to age 79).

The new schedule also lists the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) shots for children and COVID-19 and mpox jabs for adults and pregnant women. (Related: The CDC knew COVID vaccines killed 163 children and injured 57,622, but still included the deadly shots in the childhood immunization schedule.)

The figures do not yet include non-routine injections.

CDC just published its 2025 vaccine schedules. We have now gone from 7 routine vaccine injections in 1986 to over 200 routine vaccine injections in 2025.

In 1986, before vaccine makers had broad immunity to liability for injuries, CDC's schedule had 7 routine childhood… pic.twitter.com/naAGCGZdeW

— Aaron Siri (@AaronSiriSG) November 29, 2024

Meanwhile, some critics of the vaccine schedule were given hope when President-elect Donald Trump nominated Robert F. Kennedy Jr to lead the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), subject to the confirmation of the U.S. senators.

“The safety and health of all Americans is the most important role of any Administration, and HHS will play a big role in helping ensure that everybody will be protected from harmful chemicals, pollutants, pesticides, pharmaceutical products and food additives that have contributed to the overwhelming health crisis in this country,” Trump said in a post on X. “Mr. Kennedy will restore these agencies to the traditions of gold standard scientific research, and beacons of transparency, to end the chronic disease epidemic, and to Make America Great and Healthy Again!”

RFK Jr. is an environmental lawyer and a staunch opponent of the vaccine industry.

Routine vaccinations decline as exemption rates increase in children

According to CDC data, fewer kindergartners are getting routine vaccinations compared to pre-pandemic times, with the figures dipping from 95 percent in the 2019-20 school year to less than 93 percent in 2023-24.

Due to a mix of ideological and religious reasons as well as data on vaccine damages and injuries, parents refused to submit to the vaccination mandate and even resorted to keeping their kids home from school.

A CDC survey of parents in 2024 showed that 8.3 percent disagreed with the statement that school and child care “vaccination requirements for children are important and necessary.” An additional 15.2 percent of parents said they had no opinion on the issue.

“These results could indicate changes in attitudes toward routine vaccination transferring from hesitancy about COVID-19 vaccination, or toward any vaccine requirements arising from objections to COVID-19 vaccine mandates, as well as a potential for larger decreases in coverage or increases in exemptions,” CDC said.

Meanwhile, the vaccination exemption rate for this group rose from 2.5 percent in 2019-20 to 3.3. percent last year. This has been the highest level ever reported. Exemptions increased in 41 states and territories and surpassed five percent in 14 of them. That amounts to more than 126,000 kindergartners with an exemption from at least one vaccination for the 2023-24 school year.

The combined decrease in routine shots and increase in exemptions “jeopardize” the 95 percent kindergartner vaccination rate goal for measles, mumps and rubella by 2030 set by the HHS.

CDC has been persistent in meeting the 2030 goal as it vows to ensure that students begin the school year fully vaccinated by reducing the types of exemptions available.

The agency also said that it would be working with parents to avoid invoking exemptions because of difficulty meeting vaccination requirement deadlines. It also said it would convince parents that vaccines are “safe and effective” and that there are risks for children who are not vaccinated.

Check out Vaccines.news for more stories related to vaccine schedules and the damages vaccines can bring.

Sources for this article include:

• Congress.gov
• CDC.gov 1
• CDC.gov 2
• CDC.gov 3
• Edition.CNN.com
• K12Dive.com

Latest study calls for moratorium on COVID-19 gene therapy

The study, led by Philip R. Oldfield, Ph.D., and authored by renowned epidemiologist Dr. Peter McCullough, scrutinizes the safety and regulatory oversight of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine. McCullough, who rightfully opposed the COVID-19 vaccine from the beginning, said the vaccine should never have been classified as a traditional vaccine, but rather as gene therapy — a category with far more stringent regulatory requirements.

The study emphasizes the failure of the scientific community to conduct essential testing, such as toxicology, carcinogenicity and long-term safety evaluations. Most alarmingly, it points to an unsettling lack of understanding regarding the long-term effects of the spike protein and lipid nanoparticles in the vaccine.

“The truth is becoming more obvious,” said Oldfield in a statement. “As more evidence is accumulating, we are seeing undeniable signs that the risks may far outweigh the benefits of these vaccines.”

The study’s criticism extends beyond the vaccine’s classification. It highlights several key concerns, including the absence of critical testing during clinical trials. Key factors such as the amount and variability of the spike protein produced in vaccine recipients were not measured adequately, and placebo groups were unblinded prematurely, undermining the integrity of long-term safety and efficacy data.

Gene therapy turned out to be genetic weaponry

The study also references a troubling report by the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), which shows over 19,000 deaths associated with COVID-19 vaccines, a figure that far surpasses any other vaccine’s adverse events in recent history. This is particularly concerning given the typical thresholds for removing vaccines from the market. For instance, the Rotashield vaccine, linked to just 15 deaths, was swiftly withdrawn. In contrast, the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine remains widely available despite a far higher mortality rate in its initial months of use.

The authors argue that the regulatory agencies, such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), failed to address these concerns, pointing to a “widespread regulatory capture” that discouraged proper oversight. “Public health agencies could have acted responsibly and issued sound, scientifically-backed recommendations,” said Dr. McCullough. “But instead, they chose to ignore mounting safety signals.”

Recent research has also raised alarms about the neurological risks associated with this genetic weaponry. A study published in Cell Host & Microbe in late November found that the persistent presence of spike proteins in the brain could lead to lasting neurological damage. Experts like Dr. Angus Dalgleish, a professor of oncology, are particularly alarmed by the increasing number of individuals showing signs of severe neurological diseases and rapid dementia following injection.

Dr. McCullough’s study also notes that the spike protein produced by this gene therapy is widely distributed throughout the body and infiltrates vital organs, including the liver, spleen, ovaries and adrenal glands. He warns that no comprehensive studies have been conducted on how this protein interacts with the human body over the long term. This raises concerns about the vaccine’s potential to cause damage to multiple organ systems, especially since the body may continue to produce spike proteins long after injection.

Despite these mounting safety concerns, Pfizer and other manufacturers have been granted legal immunity from liability, making it difficult for injured individuals to seek justice. This liability shield has incentivized vaccine companies to downplay the risks.

How many more voices need to be raised, before this biological weapon system is shut down?

Many experts and organizations are now questioning why the mRNA vaccines are still in use despite these glaring issues. The World Council for Health, Doctors for COVID Ethics and even Florida’s Surgeon General have publicly supported halting the distribution of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines until more comprehensive safety studies are conducted.

“There is no justification for continuing this gene therapy experiment on a global scale,” said Christof Plothe, D.O., a member of the World Council for Health’s steering committee. “We still don’t know the long-term effects, and we need to stop this rollout immediately.”

As one of the study’s authors put it, “Given all the available evidence, there should be a moratorium on all mRNA injections until we have a clear understanding of their safety profile.”

How many more voices need to be raised, and how much more evidence needs to emerge before we pause the use of these “vaccines” in order to protect public health? When will they be properly classified as genetic weaponry?

Sources include:

• ChildrensHealthDefense.org
• JPAnds.org [PDF]
• MedAlerts.org
• ChildrensHealthDefense.org [PDF]

A renowned cardiologist and attorney-at-law who works as contributing editor at the Orthomolecular Medicine News Service and consults with LivOn Labs, Levy explained to investigative journalist Steve Kirsch recently how the spike proteins in the injections have a profoundly damaging impact on the human heart.

Kirsch, as you probably know, has been looking into the relationship between COVID jabs and cardiovascular injury for years now. He addressed the heart damage incurred by vaccinated pilots, as one example, this leading to changes in the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) official guidelines.

In 2022, the FAA quietly altered its electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters for pilots to accommodate those who suffered cardiac injury. The suggestion with this quiet change is that the shots are responsible for the high number of fully jabbed pilots whose hearts are now destroyed.

“The cardiac harm of course is not limited to pilots,” Kirsch says about the FAA’s widening of the ECG parameters beyond the normal range. “My best guess right now is that over 50 million Americans sustained some amount of heart damage from the shot.”

(Related: Have you checked out this report from Jonathan Landsman about how to avoid the threat of infectious diseases and vaccine damage naturally?)

mRNA spike protein damage

Dr. Levy wrote an essay called “Myocarditis: Once Rare, Now Common” that discusses many of the issues addressed in the above video interview. Levy is fully aware of the post-injection myocarditis crisis, though he personally has not seen as many affected patients as other clinical cardiologists in his field have.

“Scientific literature indicates that myocarditis is occurring quite frequently in patients harbouring the chronic presence of the covid-related spike protein,” Levy writes.

“This is being seen in many individuals with persistent chronic covid, many of whom have been vaccinated, as well as in a substantial number of individuals who have been vaccinated and have never contracted covid.”

In tests on mice, mRNA injections were clearly shown to produce spike proteins and induce myopericarditis, in turn producing the symptoms now being widely seen in fully jabbed human beings.

“While not yet clearly documented by any well-designed studies in the medical literature, a great deal of anecdotal information indicates that vaccine mRNA shedding can occur,” Levy notes.

“And once transmitted, the mRNA directly leads to spike protein production. Such mRNA shedding means that the spike protein is indirectly, if not directly as well, transmissible from one individual to another via inhalation or various forms of skin contact.”

Though some will argue that the amounts of spike protein “exposure” are too minimal to have any formidable impact, Levy points out that the replication process that occurs inside the injected host causes spike proteins to replicate, resulting in systemic inflammation or worse.

“Myocarditis, which simply means inflammation of some or all of the muscle cells in the heart, can occur when the spike protein binds to the blood vessels in the heart, to the muscle cells themselves, or both,” Levy says.

“Chest X-ray, electrocardiogram (‘ECG’), and echocardiogram can all be used to help establish the diagnosis of myocarditis. An elevated troponin level on blood testing is extremely sensitive in picking up any ongoing heart muscle cell damage, and some elevation of this test will always be seen if any significant inflammation is present in those muscle cells.”

If you are interested in learning more about vaccine damage and how to deal with it, visit ChemicalViolence.com.

Sources for this article include:

• Disswire.com
• NaturalNews.com
• FAA.gov

“Everything was a lie from the beginning. The asymptomatic people don’t transmit. Kids were not harbingers of the disease. They don’t actually, they’re like a break on the disease. Lockdowns were a farce. Masks don’t work,” he said.

He also came up with a colorful way to describe the illusion of masks helping to prevent the spread of the virus, stating: “I tell people, I joke sometimes I say masks do work. A lot like bathing suits work to keep pee out of the pool. They’re not very effective. So that’s one of those things that, you know, it was a farce. Pretty much everything they said was a farce.

He also spoke out about COVID-19 vaccines, something that has cost some doctors their medical licenses and professional reputations. Even though it has now become painfully obvious that these vaccines are, in many ways, as dangerous as a lot of us originally feared, the topic is still largely taboo among medical professionals when speaking on the record.

Dr. Urso said: “Well if you want to destroy your immune system, take a COVID-19 vaccine. It will destroy your immune system. It distributes widely in your body. It can’t be broken down because it’s a genetically modified RNA. There are contaminants, process related impurities, what I usually call them, but contaminants for most people, that they haven’t gotten out of the vaccines.”

He also drew attention to problems linked to the vaccines, such heart attacks, strokes and cancer, quoting a statistic that there were 40% more deaths in 2021 among the 18-to-64 age range after the rollout of the jabs.

In addition, he explained how the design of the vaccines is inherently flawed and they are capable of distributing their contaminants and impurities to the brain, ovaries, testes and bone marrow.

And unlike many of the doctors who are talking about this now but weren’t nearly as forthcoming a few years ago, Dr. Urso has been saying these things all along. He drew the ire of the establishment when he made comments on social media during the pandemic promoting the use of hydroxycloroquine (HCQ). He also expressed doubts about the efficacy of masks and appeared on Fox News discussing his views. In addition, he appeared at events with the group of physicians known as America’s Frontline Doctors, who shared information with the public about how they can treat the virus with alternative solutions like vitamins and HCQ.

Doctor was subject of medical board complaint after prescribing HCQ to COVID-19 patients

In 2020, the Texas Medical Board dismissed a complaint against him over his prescription of hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 patients. The medical board concluded that there wasn’t enough evidence to prove he violated the Medical Practice Act, and their investigation revealed that he was “appropriate in his care and treatment” of his patients.

Although the board did not specifically mention HCQ in its letter, Dr. Urso had previously claimed that he had been reported to them for using the drug for COVID-19 patients. It is not known who filed the complaint against him.

This type of smear campaign was common when the vaccines came out and was used as a way to discredit those who had the courage to go against government narratives and Big Pharma and point out the potential problems with injecting our bodies with untested vaccines.

Sources for this article include:

• TheBurningPlatform.com
• MedPageToday.com

(Mercola)—In this country, we’re often led to believe that vaccines are backed by solid science and have unquestionable safety. However, when you start to dig deeper, you’ll find that the evidence supporting their safety and effectiveness is often quite weak.

Since the rapid development of mRNA shots during the pandemic, many parents have been more proactive in making decisions about their children’s vaccinations. Recent data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)¹ reflect this shift, revealing that more parents of kindergarteners are becoming selective about which vaccines their child receives, or are choosing to delay certain vaccinations.

This change is driven by an increase in the number of recommended vaccines for children, coupled with rising concerns about their adverse effects. While mainstream media portrays this development as concerning, I believe it reflects a positive shift toward greater awareness and a desire among parents to make informed decisions about their children’s health care.

Fewer Parents Are Blindly Accepting the Scheduled Vaccines

According to the CDC,² for the 2023 to 2024 school year, vaccination coverage among kindergartners decreased for all reported vaccines, with the percentage for the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine (MMR) at 92.7% and the diphtheria, tetanus and acellular pertussis vaccine (DTaP) at 92.3%.

These numbers fall below the 95% threshold recommended by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.³ The CDC has also noted a record increase in vaccine exemptions among kindergartners, with the percentage of children exempt from one or more required vaccines rising from 3% to 3.3% over the past year. This increase equates to approximately 80,000 to 127,000 children.⁴

The majority of these exemptions are non-medical, indicating that parents are increasingly making conscious decisions to opt out of certain vaccinations for reasons other than health contraindications. This decline continues a trend that began in the 2019 to 2020 school year, with over 30 states reporting lower vaccination rates compared to the previous year.⁵

State-by-state data shows variations in vaccination coverage across the country. Idaho reported the lowest vaccination coverage at 79.5%, while West Virginia maintained the highest at 98.4%. Fourteen states reported exemption rates exceeding 5%, indicating that in some regions, a substantial number of parents are choosing alternative approaches to vaccination.⁶

Unsurprisingly, this decline in vaccination rates has prompted fear-inducing reports from various news outlets and comments from health officials. For instance, in a report by AP News, Dr. Raynard Washington, chair of the Big Cities Health Coalition representing 35 major metropolitan public health departments, noted that the decline in vaccination rates “explains a worrisome creep in cases of whooping cough, measles and other vaccine-preventable diseases.”⁷

Previous Research Has Questioned the Effectiveness of the Vaccines

While declining vaccination rates are being linked to the resurgence of certain diseases, numerous studies have raised doubts about the efficacy of vaccines in preventing these illnesses from the outset. This raises valid concerns for parents who are wary of exposing their children to substances they believe carry more risks than benefits.

For instance, a paper published in the journal Science Translational Medicine⁸ back in 2018 revealed that 25% of individuals vaccinated against mumps lose their immunity within eight years, while half lose it within 19 years. This decline in immunity helps explain the resurgence of mumps among college-age populations.

Moreover, virologist Stanley Plotkin stated in a Science report⁹ that research indicates the MMR vaccine produces a weaker immune response against current mumps strains compared to those from 50 years ago. Health officials subsequently recommended a third dose of MMR for 18-year-olds, further increasing the number of vaccines administered per individual. Another study published in Current Opinion in Virology showed similar findings. According to the authors:¹⁰

“Vaccine-preventable diseases (VPD) including measles and mumps have been re-emerging in countries with sustained high vaccine coverage. For mumps, waning immunity has been recognized as a major contributor to recent outbreaks … Accumulating serological and epidemiological evidence suggests that natural immunity induced by infection may be more durable compared to vaccine-induced immunity.”

When it comes to DTaP vaccines, previous research has also raised concerns regarding their long-term effectiveness and safety profile. For example, a 2021 study published in the journal Vaccine¹¹ found that its effectiveness against pertussis (whooping cough) declines rapidly over time. This finding corroborates earlier studies that similarly indicated waning immunity associated with the DTaP vaccine.^12,13,14

Vaccines Have a History of Causing Adverse Events

If a vaccine is highly effective and the risk of the disease is significant, parents would likely feel that the vaccine’s benefits outweigh its side effects. They might even support getting an extra dose.

However, if the vaccine is ineffective or if the disease is not a serious threat, the risks do not seem justified, especially if it’s been associated with serious side effects. Unfortunately, that’s the case with many of the scheduled vaccines, which have been associated with thousands of serious adverse events and hundreds of deaths.

Unofficial surveys^15,16 suggest that highly vaccinated children have more chronic health problems than unvaccinated children, and that unvaccinated children have a far lower incidence rate of autism. There’s also a growing body of research suggesting that vaccines are associated with a variety of brain and immune system disorders, including an increased risk for:

• Learning and developmental disabilities
• Brain damage
• Allergies, asthma and gut problems
• Autoimmune diseases
• Chronic infections

A study published in the Journal of Public Health and Epidemiology¹⁷ examined the correlation between autism and three specific vaccines — MMR, varicella (chickenpox) and hepatitis-A vaccines. The authors of the study suggest that the introduction of vaccines derived from human fetal cell lines, specifically the WI-38 cell line, which may harbor fetal and retroviral contaminants, could be linked to rising autism rates.

They noted a sharp increase in autism prevalence coinciding with the release of these vaccines. While this hypothesis provides one avenue for exploring the rising incidence of autism among children, it highlights a broader issue — there are many questions about vaccine science and policy that must be answered quickly before more are added to the government-recommended and mandated list for children and adults. As noted by Children’s Health Defense:¹⁸

“The truth is none of those vaccines have ever been studied or considered for their relationship to autism, so no one has any idea. This would be like trying to identify the source of a plane crash, suspecting mechanical failure, solely analyzing one of the wings, and then declaring the entire airplane free of culpability.”

What Parents Need to Know About Aluminum in Vaccines

One important aspect of vaccine safety is the presence of aluminum, a neurotoxic substance linked to increasing rates of autism and Alzheimer’s disease. For years, I have cautioned that vaccines are a significant source of aluminum exposure.

Vaccines contain a variety of components, each playing a specific role in the product’s intended function. The primary ingredient is the antigen, typically a weakened or inactivated form of the target pathogen. Adjuvants are included to supposedly enhance the immune response, with aluminum being one of the most common. Preservatives, stabilizers and residual components from the manufacturing process may also be present in the final product.¹⁹

Aluminum adjuvants have been used in vaccines for nearly a century, and were approved based on their efficacy rather than safety data. The assumption of safety, rather than rigorous testing, has led to growing concerns about long-term effects. This is particularly worrisome given that injected aluminum bypasses the body’s natural filtration systems, making it more bioavailable than ingested aluminum.^20,21

The presence of aluminum in vaccines is especially concerning for infants and young children who receive multiple doses according to recommended schedules. Studies have shown that when adjusted for body weight, the current CDC childhood vaccine schedule exposes children to aluminum levels far exceeding estimated safe limits. This raises questions about aluminum accumulation in various organs, including the brain.

Research has demonstrated aluminum’s ability to cross the blood-brain barrier and accumulate in brain tissue.²² Studies have found significant amounts of aluminum in the brains of individuals with Alzheimer’s disease, often co-located with amyloid-beta protein plaques. Some researchers have even suggested that without aluminum exposure, Alzheimer’s disease might not occur within the normal human lifespan.²³

The biological effects of aluminum are wide-ranging and impact multiple bodily systems. Aluminum has been shown to adversely affect neuronal function, disrupt cellular signaling, worsen the effects of other heavy metals and influence gene expression. It also causes mitochondrial dysfunction and ATP depletion, setting the stage for various chronic diseases.²⁴

Why Protecting Vaccine Exemptions Is Important

These known side effects of vaccines remind us why it’s so important to protect our right to make informed choices about vaccinations and to obtain vaccine exemptions in the U.S. Every individual needs to have the freedom to choose what’s best for themselves and their children, including the option to decline certain vaccines if they believe the risks are too high.

Voluntary consent is a foundation of ethical health care. It allows families to consider the risks and benefits of vaccines based on their unique health conditions. Given the lack of the science behind vaccine safety, maintaining vaccine exemption is a necessary protective measure. This is not anti-science, but a call for more thorough, independent research and greater transparency.

When it comes to protecting your family’s health, staying informed is your best strategy. Take the time to do your own research, ask questions and trust your instincts instead of simply following mandates or giving in to societal pressure. By actively seeking out information, you’re ensuring that your family’s health is in your own hands — not dictated by fear or powers that be.

VAERS — An Important Resource for Vaccine Safety Monitoring

The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) serves as an important tool for monitoring the safety of vaccines in the U.S. Established in 1990, VAERS is a national early warning system, co-managed by the CDC and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), to detect possible safety issues with vaccines.²⁵

The system allows healthcare providers, vaccine manufacturers and the general public to submit reports of adverse events that occur after vaccination. Anyone can access and search the VAERS database, which includes information such as the type of vaccine administered, the timing of the adverse event and a description of the reported symptoms.

For parents considering whether to vaccinate their child, reviewing VAERS data can be part of the process of making an informed decision. For easy access, see OpenVaers.com.²⁶

• ^{1, 2, 4, 5, 6} CDC, New Findings on Vaccination Coverage and Exemptions Among Kindergartners (2023-2024 School Year)
• ³ U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Healthy People 2030 – Vaccination Objectives
• ⁷ AP News, October 3, 2024
• ⁸ Sci Transl Med. 2018 Mar 21;10(433):eaao5945
• ⁹ Science, March 21, 2018
• ¹⁰ Current Opinion in Virology Volume 40, February 2020, Pages 48-54
• ¹¹ Vaccine. 2021 May 27;39(23):3120-3130
• ¹² American Academy of Pediatrics, June 10, 2019
• ¹³ Pediatrics (2016) 137 (3): e20153326
• ¹⁴ CMAJ November 01, 2016 188 (16) E399-E406
• ¹⁵ SAGE Open Med. 2020 May 27;8:2050312120925344
• ¹⁶ NewportRI.com March 21, 2019
• ¹⁷ Journal of Public Health and Epidemiology September 2014: 6(9); 271-286 (PDF)
• ¹⁸ Children’s Health Defense, August 11, 2020
• ¹⁹ Australian Academy of Science, What Is in a Vaccine?
• ²⁰ Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2017 Sep 29;114(39):653–659
• ²¹ EFSA J. 2008 Jul 15;6(7):754
• ²² Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(8), 7228
• ²³ SciTechDaily.com, January 21, 2020
• ²⁴ Toxics. 2021 Jun 17;9(6):142
• ²⁵ CDC, August 7, 2024
• ²⁶ OpenVaers

This comes from an investigation conducted by COVID-19 Substack blogger Super Sally, who noted that, adding the number of fewer births and the number of excess deaths from 2020 to 2023, the Philippines had an “unrealized population” – the number of people who should have been living at the time – of about 1.285 million people. (Related: Philippine government reports 297,000 excess deaths linked to COVID-19 vaccines.)

“New readers may be shocked at the excess mortality in 2021, which started only in March of that year,” wrote Sally. However, “I believe that the 2021 mortality and birth data was throttled in early 2022, and the devastation of 2021 will likely be hidden forever.”

Sally’s data comes from an analysis of the PSA, which publishes reports yearly on data collected from the Philippine Civil Registration System, including vital statistics like births, marriages and deaths.

Rise in deaths and decline in births coincide with COVID-19 vaccine rollout

The Philippines’ mass COVID-19 vaccination program was initiated in March 2021, around the same time the country’s unrealized population started surging. While there were a few COVID-19 “vaccine” brands used in the Philippines, the Janssen vaccine by Johnson & Johnson and supplied to the nation through the COVID-19 Vaccines Global Access (COVAX) program of the World Health Organization is believed to be the biggest killer for the country.

“The big spike in deaths which happened in every single region [of the Philippines] in July of 2021 was concurrent with the rollout of Janssen [COVID-19 vaccines] which were delivered to all regions with 3.2 million doses administered within just a few weeks,” wrote Sally. “There was a second death spike in January 2022, also matching the second Philippine delivery of 5.2 million new doses of Janssen.”

“All Janssen doses were delivered under the COVAX program,” she continued. “This is not to say other injectables were not deadly and causative of excess deaths, just that Janssen drove those excess deaths to a new devastating high.”

If 2019 is taken as the last normal and reference year, there have been 908,566 fewer births and 386,939 excess deaths from 2020 through 2023. This gives an “unrealized population” of 1.285 million.

Overall 2023 deaths are slightly higher than 2022 levels, and 2023 births are just slightly lower than 2022 levels. Both may rise slightly in the final reports that will be issued early in 2025.

The deaths are higher than 2022 levels for many months, with even some data points higher than 2021, which was the prior worst year. Early in 2023 births were higher than 2022 and 2021 levels. However, by the end of the year births had dropped, across almost all regions to levels similar to 2021.

Watch this video of a hearing in the Philippine House of Representatives as congressmen investigate the nearly 300,000 excess deaths caused by the COVID-19 vaccines.

This video is from the channel The Prisoner on Brighteon.com.

More related stories:

• Deaths and injuries from COVID-19 vaccines could put insurance companies at risk of bankruptcy.
• Bill Gates’ “days are numbered,” say Japanese scientists after ABORTION DRUGS found in “vaccines.”
• The COVID “vaccine” is an intentional effort at world genocide.
• Report: VACCINES and LOCKDOWNS are responsible for excess all-cause mortality, not COVID-19 infection.
• Study of 125 countries reveals inconvenient truth: Excess mortality was caused by democide and vaccine mandates, not “covid.”

Sources include:

• SHTFPlan.com
• SuperSally.Substack.com
• Brighteon.com