A state long known for its steadfast support of Democratic candidates, New Jersey saw tighter margins than expected in the presidential election, fueling speculation about its future political alignment. While Kamala Harris ultimately secured the Garden State’s 14 electoral votes with a narrow lead of 51.5% to Donald Trump’s 46.5%, the results left analysts and insiders raising questions about New Jersey’s role as a Democratic stronghold.
Across the country, Trump staged a remarkable comeback, clinching the presidency by improving upon his 2020 performance in both red and blue states alike. His campaign’s focus on battleground states paid off, with a sweeping victory in critical regions that ultimately brought him to the 270 Electoral College votes needed to secure the White House. Swing states like Arizona, Nevada, Georgia, Michigan, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin delivered Trump’s winning numbers, contributing a combined 93 electoral votes.
In particular, his success in Arizona and Nevada, where he led by a five-point margin, underscored a new Republican momentum. States like Georgia, Michigan, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, each reporting over 95% of the vote, confirmed Trump as the victor with convincing leads.
Yet, among all the results, it was New Jersey’s shift that caught the eye of political commentators. Although Harris held on to the state, the gap between the two candidates highlighted a potential change in voter preferences, especially in suburban and rural areas where Republicans have shown significant gains. Politico, in its post-election analysis, even suggested that New Jersey might be on the cusp of becoming a swing state—a notion nearly unfathomable just a few election cycles ago.
Traditionally a reliable blue state, New Jersey’s recent election results are causing many to reconsider its political identity. Though Harris ultimately won, Trump’s performance marked a huge shift. He lost by only five points—narrower than any Republican result in the state since George H.W. Bush in 1992. Politico called it “the closest it has in a generation to casting its electoral votes for a Republican president.” […]
— Read More: trendingpoliticsnews.com
Controlling Protein Is One of the Globalists’ Primary Goals
Between the globalists, corporate interests, and our own government, the food supply is being targeted from multiple angles. It isn’t just silly regulations and misguided subsidies driving natural foods away. Bird flu, sabotaged food processing plants, mysterious deaths of entire cattle herds, arson attacks, and an incessant push to make climate change the primary consideration for all things are combining for a perfect storm to exacerbate the ongoing food crisis.
The primary target is protein. Specifically, they’re going after beef as the environmental boogeyman. They want us eating vegetable-based proteins, lab-grown meat, or even bugs instead of anything that walked the pastures of America. This is why we launched a long-term storage prepper beef company that provides high-quality food that’s shelf-stable for up to 25-years.
At Prepper All-Naturals, we believe Americans should be eating real food today and into the future regardless of what the powers-that-be demand of us. We will never use lab-grown beef. We will never allow our cattle to be injected with mRNA vaccines. We will never bow to the draconian diktats of the climate change cult.
Visit Prepper All-Naturals and use promo code “veterans25” to get 25% off plus free shipping on Ribeye, NY Strip, Tenderloin, and other high-quality cuts of beef. It’s cooked sous vide, then freeze dried and packaged with no other ingredients, just beef. Stock up for the long haul today.
