If you have fair skin and live in the Boston area, you will probably want to avoid ever getting “care” at Brigham and Women’s Hospital because the “antiracist” staff that works there could intentionally kill you in order to “correct” the problem of “systemic racism.”
Article by Ethan Huff from Natural News.
According to an article published in the Boston Review, Brigham and Women’s Hospital is now offering “preferential care based on race” as part of new “race-explicit interventions” that aim to disenfranchise whites while catering to blacks and browns.
Harvard Medical School professors Bram Wispelwey, an “LGBT-rights” activist, and Michelle Morse, a black woman, say that discriminating against whites in the medical profession is good and necessary, even though doing so “may elicit legal challenges from our system of colorblind law.”
✔️ Boost your immune system with Nutraceutical by Dr. Zev Zelenko
✔️ Beat supply chain issues and future pharmaceutical tyranny with 5 Antibiotics Delivered to Your Home
✔️ Be ready to help yourself and your family with the World’s Best Med Kit
“But given the ample current evidence that our health, judicial, and other systems already unfairly preference people who are white, we believe … that our approach is corrective and therefore mandated,” they write.
Not only do Wispelwey and Morse want the corrupt Brigham and Women’s Hospital to adopt their new anti-white policies, but they are also encouraging other institutions to “proceed confidently on behalf of equity and racial justice.”
Racist doctors say Biden executive orders support not providing medical care to whites
Citing numerous executive orders recently signed by Resident Biden, Wispelwey and Morse say that American hospitals have a mandate to withhold care from whites, allowing them to die so more black and brown people can get drugged and undergo surgery at the front of the line.
After abolishing President Donald Trump’s 1776 Commission, which sought to once again teach foundational American civics in schools, Hunter’s dad on his first day in office signed an executive order requiring “an equity assessment in federal agencies.”
Based on this, Wispelwey and Morse concluded that too many white people are being treated at hospitals, which constitutes “racial inequity.” From now on, only black and brown people should be treated, they say, and white people left to die.
“What we need … we have come to believe, is a proactively antiracist agenda for medicine,” they wrote, adding that things like “implicit bias training” and “checklists” will have to suffice whenever “indirect solutions where more direct forms of race-explicit action” are not available.
The two professors are piloting their program at Brigham and Women’s Hospital with the hope that it will be expanded nationwide. They say the “equitable solutions” offered will ensure that more black and brown people receive care instead of white people.
Citing leftist economist William Darity Jr.’s “reparations framework,” Wispelwey and Morse believe that “black and Latinx patients” need to be prioritized over white people, which also ties into their “Redress” program that “is intended to discriminate against whites who require medical attention so other individuals can automatically be given treatment.”
“Redress could take multiple forms, from cash transfers and discounted or free care to taxes on nonprofit hospitals that exclude patients of color and race-explicit protocol changes (such as preferentially admitting patients historically denied access to certain forms of medical care),” they explain.
Brigham and Women’s will prioritize five neighborhoods in Boston with the highest black and Latino populations as part of the program. Non-whites in these areas will be engaged through outreach to take the place of whites at hospitals, as well as be apologized to for the “institutional racism” of America.
“Brigham and Women’s Hospital’s decision to discriminate in providing medical services makes it ineligible to receive federal funding and jeopardizes the federal funding of Harvard Medical School with which it is affiliated,” warns GianCarlo Canaparo, a senior fellow at The Heritage Foundation.
More related news about the problem of systemic “woke” racism against whites can be found at AntiWhite.news
Sources for this article include:
Will America-First News Outlets Make it to 2023?
Things are looking grim for conservative and populist news sites.
There’s something happening behind the scenes at several popular conservative news outlets. 2021 was bad, but 2022 is proving to be disastrous for news sites that aren’t “playing ball” with the corporate media narrative. It’s being said that advertisers are cracking down, forcing some of the biggest ad networks like Google and Yahoo to pull their inventory from conservative outlets. This has had two major effects. First, it has cooled most conservative outlets from discussing “taboo” topics like Pandemic Panic Theater, voter fraud, or The Great Reset. Second, it has isolated those ad networks that aren’t playing ball.
Certain topics are anathema for most ad networks. Speaking out against vaccines or vaccine mandates is a certain path to being demonetized. Highlighting voter fraud in the 2020 and future elections is another instant advertising death penalty. Throw in truthful stories about climate change hysteria, Critical Race Theory, and the border crisis and it’s easy to understand how difficult it is for America-First news outlets to spread the facts, share conservative opinions, and still pay the bills.
Without naming names, I have been told of several news outlets who have been forced to either consolidate with larger organizations or who have backed down on covering certain topics out of fear of being “canceled” by the ad networks. I get it. This is a business for many of us and it’s not very profitable. Those of us who do this for a living are often barely squeaking by, so loss of additional revenue can often mean being forced to make cuts. That means not being able to cover the topics properly. Its a Catch-22: Tell the truth and lose the money necessary to keep telling the truth, or avoid the truth and make enough money to survive. Those who have chosen survival simply aren’t able to spread the truth properly.
We will never avoid the truth. The Lord will provide if it is His will. Our job is simply to share the facts, spread the Gospel, and educate as many Americans as possible while exposing the forces of evil.
To those who have the means, we ask that you please donate. We have options available now, but there is no telling when those options will cancel us. We have our GivingFuel page. There have been many who have been canceled by PayPal, but for now it’s still an option. Your generosity is what keeps these sites running and allows us to get the truth to the masses. We’ve had great success in growing but we know we can do more with your assistance.
Thank you, and God Bless!
JD Rucker
All ORIGINAL content on this site is © 2021 NOQ Report. All REPUBLISHED content has received direct or implied permission for reproduction.
With that said, our content may be reproduced and distributed as long as it has a link to the original source and the author is credited prominently. We don’t mind you using our content as long as you help out by giving us credit with a prominent link. If you feel like giving us a tip for the content, we will not object!
JD Rucker – EIC
@jdrucker
